DELEN HEERST HARD

Ohhhhh, kut fuck shit! Er is materiaal online gejast waaruit blijkt dat Michael Jackson, die tijdens zijn leven al bekend stond als pervert, nu na zijn dood ook bekend zal staan als pervert.

Niets nieuws dus eigenlijk en inderdaad ook echt niets nieuws. Eerst dachten we na het lezen van de PDF (pdf-alert) in de redactiebunker dat Frisco gewoon op bezoek was geweest bij Michael Jackson en na ‘even zijn email te checken’ wat tabbladen open had laten staan, maar Jackson bleek gewoon het internet in hardwarematige vorm op Neverland te hebben staan. Kijk, kraakhelder, Jackson was dus serieus raar. Een normaal mens streamt die shit namelijk.

Het materiaal in kwestie is destijds gebruikt als bewijsmateriaal in een rechtszaak tegen Michael Jackson, om aan te tonen dat hij schuldig was aan kindermisbruik. Hij is destijds volledig vrijgesproken. Overigens heeft hij vlak voor zijn dood wel een schikking van 200 miljoen dollar getroffen met zijn “slachtoffers”, maar dat hoeft in principe niets te betekenen.

We hebben nog niet alles doorgenomen, maar zijn inmiddels op ongeveer een derde van de tekst. Tot nu toe valt de onderzoekende sheriff “based on my training” keer op keer over boeken met fotomateriaal dat als “grooming” zou kunnen dienen. Maar de meeste van die boeken zijn zogenaamde artistieke fotoboeken die bij een beetje goed geoutilleerde kunstboekhandel ook wel te vinden zijn. Wat zeg ik, zelfs bij bol.com kan je blijkbaar als pedoseksueel in spe al je slag slaan.

Bij ondergetekende staan zowel Sumo (helaas mini-versie) van Helmut Newton als de volledige serie “The History of Men’s Magazines” van Taschen prominent in zicht in de woonkamer. Nu maar hopen dat het Sheriff’s Department van Santa Barbara County nooit bij mij thuis komt snuffelen, maar die kans lijkt mij gelukkig te verwaarlozen.

Reaguur dan!

2 reaguursels op "Michael Jackson, the king of porn"

Laat weten wanneer
avatar
Plaatjes
 
 
 
Audio en Video bestanden
 
 
 
Sorteer op:   nieuwste | oudste | meest gestemd
behanger, Musicaldeskundige

Ik vind het nog immer voorbarig om mee te huilen met de wolven in het bos en zo stellig te beweren dat Michael Jackson een actieve pedo was. Lees dit:

The story is rather tragic.  I do believe that had the internet existed in 1994 in it’s current form, Jackson would still be alive today.  Jackson was very much the victim of public perception.  Yes, he was clearly an eccentric with many quirks, but the “child molestation” thing was hogwash.  GQ published a non-bias article in 1994 entitled “Was Michael Jackson Framed?” that you can find all over the net.  Here’s one link:  http://floacist.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/gq-article-was-michael-jackson-framed/ …    It’s a pretty fascinating read that details exactly what happened during that first accusation. Most people haven’t read it, though… because it’s easier and more “interesting” (and at the time, “funnier”) to imagine him as some kind of freak.

Anyone unfamiliar with what actually happened there, I’d really recommend reading it. The TL;DR: version is pretty god damn fucked up.  He befriended a young boy, his mother and step-father.  The biological father wanted money to produce “Robin Hood Men In Tights” so he brainwashed his son with sodium Amytal in an attempt to extort money out of Jackson… knowing full-well he wouldn’t want to go through a long career-tarnishing trial.  There’s taped conversations between the father and step-father where the father lays out his entire plan.
> “And if I go through with this, I win big-time. There’s no way I lose. I’ve checked that inside out. I will get everything I want, and they will be destroyed forever. June will lose [custody of the son]…and Michael’s career will be over.”

It’s whack.  Seriously… read it.  FYI, the father ended up killing himself in 2009 only 5 months after Jackson died: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Chandler

My point is, public perception in 1994 was so heavily dependent on shock media, magazine covers, radio, talk show monologues, etc.  Had Reddit existed back then, we would have seen the smoking gun.  People would be chatting over the details on a daily basis.  It would have been very difficult for the public to remain that misinformed and warped by rumor and here say.  

But the perception stuck.  And clearly it weighed heavily on Jackson… someone who had dedicated his life to helping children in need.  He was clearly depressed.  He turned to drugs.  As we later found out, he needed to be medicated to even sleep.  I can’t imagine what that had to have been like..

That was the only time anyone ever accused Jackson of wrongdoing… until 11 years later in 2005, but this time it was CLEARLY bullshit and a clear attempt at extortion.  Anyone following that trial was aware of how ridiculous the claims were.  I’ll summarize.  It was right after the huge documentary “Living with Michael Jackson” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Living_with_Michael_Jackson that Martin Bashir did.  Jackson was all over the news for the “baby dangling” incident.  In the documentary, it showed that Jackson took in a young cancer patient, his mother and sister and was paying for the boy’s treatment (last I heard, he’s now cancer-free).  He was close with the boy and the family.  It made the news, because of the scene where Jackson says, “What’s wrong with sharing a bed with someone you love?” in reference to the young boy.  The public took it (or twisted it) to be a sexual thing… Jackson intended it as an innocent remark… hanging out late playing video games on a massive bed and someone passes out.  Inappropriate?  Maybe.  Molestation?  No.  Anyways… the mother of the boy had been in and out of mental institutions and had attempted to con money from celebrities in the past (the reason for Jay Leno and George Lopez being at the trial).  She also claimed her family had been “sexually fondled” by JC Penny security after her punk kids shoplifted… she settled out of court for $152k http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Michael_Jackson#J.C._Penney:_alleged_assault.2C_litigation_and_psychiatric_analysis .  So anyhow, the Bashir documentary was a shitshow, people like Gloria Allred were petitioning to have Jackson’s kids taken away… and Jackson’s handlers told him to distance himself from the young boy and the family… so he cut them off.  It was only after that, that the woman and the boy accused Jackson of misconduct.  The funny part was, they literally claimed the molestation started AFTER the documentary aired.  As if Jackson hung out with the kid, let them live at Neverland, passed out playing videogames, filmed a documentary admitting that it was innocent… and then when the entire world started looking at the relationship with a magnifying glass and wanted to take away Jackson’s kids (and apparently the family had already been interviewed by police)… THAT’s when Jackson decided to start molesting the kid.  Come on…  Whole thing was a crock of shit.  The woman also claimed they were held hostage at Neverland… to which they pulled up the creditcard receipts showing all the shopping sprees she was doing with Jackson’s money during the “kidnapping”.  At one point they point out, “How could you be kidnapped if you were shopping at Nordstroms, Tiffanys… here’s a receipt for a body wax”.  The woman snapped back , “IT WASN’T A BODY WAX!!! IT WAS A LEG WAX!! HE’S LYING TO YOU!!!” ….  Total shitshow.  Read up on it.  It’s was fucked.  You can read most of this on wiki:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Michael_Jackson

That 2005 Trial doesn’t happen without the 1993 situation.  It was the same DA (Tom Sneddon) who tried to get Jackson in 1993 that was pushing for the 2005 thing.  It was only mildly plausible, because of the 1993 thing.  They tried to find other boys to step forward (out of the thousands who Jackson had been in contact with over the years) and nobody stepped forward.  They had a former body guard (who had sold his story to National Enquirer and had previously been arrested for armed robbery) claim he saw Jackson blowing Macauley Culkin in a shower… they brought Culkin up there to respond and he’s like, “WUT?” … As one journalist put it:  

>”the trial featured perhaps the most compromised collection of prosecution witnesses ever assembled in an American criminal case…the chief drama of the trial quickly turned into a race to see if the DA could manage to put all of his witnesses on the stand without getting any of them removed from the courthouse in manacles.””

Nobody following that trial was surprised by the outcome.  

It’s some sad stuff, man.  Despite this, the perception stuck. People continued to hate him and paint him as a monster.  People continued to take the rumors and tabloid gossip as truth… and I think ultimately it killed him.  

Edit: I should admit I’m slightly bias… my cousin spent a lot of time at Neverland hanging out with MJ when she was a kid and she said it was ALWAYS filled with children (mostly underprivileged kids, children with disabilities or sickness) and that Jackson was a fucking saint.  She’s still depressed about his death and doesn’t like talking about it.

Edit 2:  Someone forwarded this to me.  A short interview from 2003 with the author of that GQ article (Mary A Fischer) right after the second allegations broke:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIxU3cWkqW0 … In the interview, she points out a detail I forgot.  In both the 1993 and 2003 allegations, the parents’ first instinct wasn’t to go to police… but to lawyer up.  In both instances, they went to the same lawyer (Larry Feldman) who specializes in civil litigation.  Strange behavior if you actually think your kid has been abused.

Hoofdmeester

Brekend! Stopt den persen! Reet verklaart kinderpornografisch materiaal in huis te hebben! Schandpaal! Pek ende veren!

wpDiscuz